Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(35)
Results: Eighteen studies having a combined population (N) of 4076 25844 diabetic subjects, 1492 controls) satisfied the inclusion criteria.
Recently, there have appeared lots of studies having a strong interest in semi-smoothing Newton method and feasible methods [1 3].
As a general remark from the reviewed studies, having a through-thickness z-binder (ORT and AI) can suppress delamination and delay final failure.
Unfortunately, the absence of systematic information about hinterland flows could not help to delineate them with precision, which is a recurrent problem in port geography (Guerrero 2014), especially for studies having a historical focus.
Using similar scoring criteria and ED chart review, the authors reported discrepancies in 2.0% of studies overall, with 1.6% of overall studies having a significant discordance and 0.43% requiring an immediate change in management [1].
Moreover, the quality of evidence is relatively low, with almost all studies having a before-and-after design, which make them prone to bias due to secular trends unrelated to the study intervention or to changes in hospital case mix, a variable which is difficult to adjust for.
Similar(25)
All studies had a male predominance.
All studies had a split litter design.
Only few studies had a representative sample.
Six studies have a randomized controlled design.
These studies have a number of strengths.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com