Scholars in disciplines like women's studies and black studies have argued about such dual allegiances and about whether it is possible to avoid scholarship that has what Henry Louis Gates Jr. once referred to as a "thumb on the scale".
Studies have argued that the dominant culture in the mainstreamed community inhibit parent-professional partnerships.
In this regard, several studies have argued for the need to combine different policy instruments in so-called policy mixes.
An influential series of studies have argued that young children are unable to use landmark information to reorient.
Studies have argued that empathy to the pain of out-group members is largely diminished by "in-group empathy bias".
As all four studies have argued, learner training is of crucial importance in dispelling the myths surrounding hybrid language instruction.
But critics of this and subsequent similar studies have argued that choosing merely reveals preferences that were already there.
Several influential studies have argued that intolerance is not a prerequisite for a segregated society, and that segregation can arise even when people generally prefer diversity.
Some studies have argued that implementation of financial incentives without complementary non-financial incentives seldom improve health worker performance [7, 25].
Prior studies have argued that females will be more susceptible to socio-emotive aspects of website design, when compared to males [3, 40].
Authors of many studies have argued that representational attitude verbs can exhibit parenthetical uses (e.g., Urmson 1952; Hooper 1975; Simons 2007).
