Several features make our study different from previous studies of TRAIL, which used free ligand or adenoviral constructs in gliomas.
That made this study different from other similar studies in which too many variables from several teeth were considered.
What makes the present study different from the previous series is the ratio of upfront to salvage intervention.
A new idea contributed in this study different from the others is a way of extracting compositional features of the read groups.
Three methodological aspects, including full sets of viral tests applied, immunocompetent patients enrolled, and two control groups, made our study different from previous published data [ 3- 5, 15- 17].
Nevertheless, in both studies, the individuals were older and also the methodology of these studies was different from our study.
The populations in those studies were different from our study population.
8, 10 However, allele frequency of this present study was different from studies in other parts of Thailand.
However, the approaches taken in these studies are different from the work presented in this paper.
Therefore, the results of this study were different from previous studies which used solutions with specific elements.
