Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Block and event-related stimulus designs are typically used in fMRI studies depending on the importance of detection power or estimation efficiency.
In general, a mixed pattern of neuropsychological deficits are displayed across studies, depending on the sampling method, methodological design, statistics employed, control groups, and assessment tools that were utilized.
aSome aspects are not relevant for all studies, depending on choice of test species.
Mortality rates vary between studies depending on associated injuries, but have been noted to range from 5 to 36% [3].
Following Drummond et al.'s [10] categorization scheme, we differentiated studies depending on whether costs, consequences, or both were considered.
It also demonstrates why other studies depending on larger levels of aggregations would show near proportionality averaging over the difference between kinds of areas.
The incidence of endophthalmitis in this setting varies from 3% to 48% in various studies, depending on a variety of factors which include setting of trauma, delay of repair, retained intraocular foreign body, and involvement of the crystalline lens [1].
There are subtle variations in the exact definition of both conditions in various studies, depending on the method of assessment, although the latter is commonly defined as BMI ≥30 kg/m2 [34].
All in all, this work not only provides an important additional line of evidence for detecting pre-miRNAs but is also useful for studies depending on deep sequencing data which often contains contaminated sequences [45].
Since then, studies depending on all kinds of functional responses sprang up quickly, such as of Holling type [1 3], Michaelis-Menton type [4], Beddington-DeAngelis type [5], Ivlev type [6], Hassell-Varley type [7], and so on.
It is important to note that there are some inconsistencies between studies depending on the type of stressor and the specific paradigm (i.e. homotypic vs. heterotypic, chronic vs. acute).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com