Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Our approach at this stage erred on the side of inclusivity, with studies being retained if the title and abstract made any reference to tagging in retail environments.
The search resulted in the review of 249 abstracts, with 50 studies being retained for full text review.
Similar(58)
Results Our initial search yielded 1528 citations and 131 studies were retained for further analysis.
After eliminating duplicates and reviewing the remaining abstracts, 45 studies were retained for a more detailed analysis.
Ultimately, 57 studies were retained for analysis.
Studies were retained if insufficient information was available to reliably exclude them.
After the secondary screening process, 17 studies were retained (listed in Table 1).
Exclusion of outliers did not affect inferences, so all studies were retained in the analyses.
However, because this did not affect the results, these studies were retained.
The titles and abstracts of the remaining 709 studies were screened, and 27 studies were retained for full-text review.
The full text review was performed by three reviewers (NT, RCW, EH) on 50 studies, and 19 studies were retained.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com