Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
75 However, the effect of smoking with a reduced uptake on health check-ups has not been found in all studies as two systematic reviews have shown.
Whether sedentary behaviours contribute to risk independently from MVPA is not clear from these studies, as two of them (Patel et al, 2008; Gierach et al, 2009) did not adjust for level of MVPA.
Furthermore, although the analysis in which data from the two studies were combined into one dataset treated the studies as two conditions in an experiment, it was quasi-experimental.
There was no clear outcome from these studies, as two studies using AFLP, SSR, MSAP or DArT markers (Noyer et al., 2005; Risterucci et al., 2009) found genetic homogeneity within this subgroup, whereas two other studies based on RAPD and AFLP markers (Crouch et al., 2000; Ude et al., 2003) found 'Plantain' subgroup genetic heterogeneity.
Similar(56)
In terms of potential bias avoidance, our assessment identified two of the six studies as excellent, two as good and two as weak.
The bias avoidance assessment suggested there was variability in the extent to which bias was avoided; our assessment identified two of the six studies as excellent, two as good and two as weak.
Treatment schedules varied among the studies as three studies investigated intravenous irinotecan given either weekly for 4 weeks followed by two weeks break, given every other week or given every third week [ 30, 32, 33].
Here, optimized punctured ZCZ sequence-pairs and are studied as two examples in the following parts.
The ceramic volume fraction and sintering protocol were studied as two main input variables in the design and fabrication steps.
However, as the above two steps are mostly studied as two independent problems, the learned feature representation may not be tailored to the objective of hashing function learning.
Undifferentiated dyspnea was defined for the purpose of this study as two or more possible etiologies in the differential diagnosis according to their treating clinician.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com