Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(4)
The quality of eligible studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklist for systematic reviews (CASP 2013), which considers a range of key criteria including population studied (sample size and representativeness), methodology and standard of reporting of statistical analysis.
Finally, in the population studied, sample size calculations suggest several years of follow-up would be necessary to measure states that change daily given the injury rates.
These apparent inconsistencies may reflect differences in populations studied, sample size, glycaemic measures, adjustment for confounders or intra‐individual variation in blood glucose levels and reverse causality.
This form included headings to collate information on the name, location and socio-demographic composition (e.g., age, income level) of the ethnic groups studied, sample size, study design, and beliefs reported.
Similar(56)
Study sample size ranged from 120 to 3173 subjects.
Final inclusion criteria were: (1) Study sample size > 300.
Study sample size and income were the only significant predictors of journal impact factor.
The possibility of an alpha error is generally inversely related to study sample size.
Study sample size estimates prior to this study were based on estimates of effect sizes derived from the published evidence.
Study sample sizes ranged from 68 to 2419.
Study sample sizes ranged between 68 and 2419 (Table 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com