Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Most studies are based on clinical or student samples.
Thus, our findings may not generalize to other student samples.
The results from both sets of student samples are compared and discussed.
Prior to DNA extraction, procedures were implemented to ensure complete anonymity of student samples.
The student samples from these countries were therefore not used in this study.
To begin, we investigated whether the student samples in control and module courses were equivalent.
Similarities and differences between student samples may influence the replicability of findings.
This is important because much of the virtual teams research has been based on student samples, which are easier to access and control, with the implicit assumption that the findings from student samples will generalize to organizational virtual teams.
First, the cross-cultural generalizability of the scales was investigated across Italian (N = 421) and Dutch (N = 419) student samples.
For each item with comparable RT distributions among the two student samples, the student samples were combined to produce one set of RT distributions and conditional P+, which led to one RT threshold defined.
By examining how RTs distributed in the two student samples (MST and Control) and in the further disaggregated performance groups, we had the following observations: First, the RT distributions for all routing-block items were similar between the student samples.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com