Sentence examples similar to structures of bargaining from inspiring English sources

Since the empirical literature largely failed to incorporate a dominant characteristic of collective bargaining since the 1990s, namely decentralization, we next focused on Visser's (2013) detailed and updated discussion of national collective bargaining institutions, documenting changes in bargaining coverage, the structure of bargaining, and bargaining coordination over time.

Very soon, however, the union measure became more nuanced to reflect the structure of bargaining and the internalization of external wage effects—not just the simple exertion of market power.

Focusing on the results for unionization, where the key variables are the percentage of workers covered by collective agreements and the structure of bargaining (individual negotiations with workers, firm-level agreements with unions, sectoral/national agreements, and both firm-level and national/sectoral bargaining), the main findings are twofold.

This being said, the implications of alternative structures of collective bargaining are poorly understood.

Although one has to be especially careful when discussing existing structures of collective bargaining by reason of their manifest diversity and continuing evolution, the trend toward decentralization, although not outright convergence, seems incontrovertible.

Moreover, trust among social partners appears to be just as important in bringing about macro flexibility as the structure of collective bargaining.

It has long been argued that trust may be just as important in securing macro (and micro) flexibility as the structure of collective bargaining itself.

The effects of the minimum wage and of tax wedges are primarily on the level of unemployment rather than on the fluctuations in unemployment; the structure of collective bargaining, however, affects both.

In an important qualifying comment on the implications of alternative collective bargaining institutions for macro flexibility, it has recently been argued by Blanchard et al. (2013, p. 20) that "trust among the social partners appears to be just as important in bringing about macro flexibility as the structure of collective bargaining".

It is reported that the more frequently the institutional structure of collective bargaining is changed, the more pronounced is unemployment and the higher is inflation, from which result the authors contend that there are no net benefits of new institutional structures for up to 4 years after the transition.

Even more important, the New Deal and the new unions that it encouraged sought to "constitutionalize" work in the nation's industrial economy, creating a structure of collective bargaining that not only boosted wages, but which created a system of industrial jurisprudence that mimicked the lawyers, courts, and judges which governed citizenship rights in the larger community.