Sentence examples for structure of the proposition from inspiring English sources

The logical structure of the proposition is therefore best displayed — says Bolzano — by the words 'Socrates has wisdom'.

First, the structure of the proposition must conform to the constraints of logical form, and second, the elements of the proposition must have reference (bedeutung).

But it is clear that components of our propositions can be analysed by means of a definition, and must be, if we want to approximate to the real structure of the proposition.

However, in a properly analyzed proposition, there is a clear isomorphism between the structure of the proposition and the structure of the fact that would make it true (PLA, 197); hence a precise and analyzed proposition is capable of being true in one and only one way (Vag, 219).

By showing that the actual structure of the proposition is quite a bit different from what it appears from the grammar of the sentence "The author of Waverly = Scott, Russelll believed he had shown how it might be more informative than a trivial instance of the law of identity (OD, 51 54).

This extended Frege's idea that natural language misleads us about the structure of the propositions we assert.

The complement sentence structure of the propositions creates a stative, established stance.

Frege concluded that we need a Begriffsschrift, distinct from the languages we naturally speak, in order to depict (and help us discern) the structures of the propositions we express by using natural languages.

More importantly, Frege's treatment of quantified propositions departs radically from the traditional idea that the grammatical structure of sentence reflects the logical structure of the indicated proposition.

Depending on the particular structure of the consequent proposition, three main types of fuzzy models are distinguished as: (1) Linguistic (Mamdani-Type) fuzzy model (Zadeh 1973; Mamdani 1977), (2) Fuzzy relational model (Pedrycz 1984; Yi and Chung 1993), (3) Takagi Sugeno (TS) fuzzy model (Takagi and Sugeno 1985).

Since the things a term stands for are not established a priori but dependent on propositional context, the analysis of the structure of a proposition in terms of the identity relation requires a correspondence theory of truth.