"structure of premises" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is commonly used in academic or legal writing to refer to the arrangement or organization of statements or facts that form the basis of an argument or proposition. Example: The structure of premises in the paper is clear and logical, leading to a strong conclusion. In this example, "structure of premises" is used to describe how the arguments or premises in the paper are presented and connected to support the main argument or conclusion.
The book provides a unique perspective presenting a coherent and original structure of premise, mood, description, philosophy, history, and even prejudice.
So these logicians attempted to specify inductive support probabilities solely in terms of the syntactic structure of premise and conclusion sentences.
Indeed, a recent study provides evidence that these other kinds of information e.g., knowledge of the structure of premise pair presentation acquired through training may also facilitate new hierarchy learning (Kumaran, In Press).
Some inductive logicians have tried to follow the deductive paradigm very closely by attempting to specify inductive support probabilities in terms of the syntactic structures of premise and conclusion sentences.
A central problem of Aristotle's theory is that the structure of the premises is not analyzed.
In overhauling the structure of the premises, the National Trust restored its medieval character by recreating on the ground floor the appearance of arcaded stalls opening onto the street, and the sixteenth-century decoration of the upstairs windows, although this caused a dilemma as it required the removal of fine 18th-century windows.
As far as the structure of the premises and availability of materials are concerned, the majority of shops lacked a separate dispensing area, a refrigerator, a prescription recording book, and a cupboard for keeping narcotic and psychotropic substances.
While there may not be any principle that is very close in structure to premise (5) of the basic argument, there is such a principle in the literature on free will and determinism, proposed by Peter van Inwagen (1983) that can be used by the foreknowledge/free will incompatibilist.
"The historical structure of Utah is premised on a level of intolerance of Mormon pioneers being driven out of Illinois... because of their faith," he said.
