Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(17)
This paper introduces the characteristics of each document and compares the structure, items and level of requirements.
All the comparisons were based on 31 stem-equivalent structure items and 8 stem-equivalent reading items answered by the three groups.
It was found that while the reading item coefficients appeared to be normally distributed, some of those for the structure items indicated non-normal distribution.
The 3-option items produced the highest number of AENO values between k-0.5 and k, 15 among the structure items and five among the reading items, with the 4- and 5-option items producing only five and three respectively for the structure items and one each for the reading items.
For the structure items the third distractors were more successful than the fourth distractor present only in the 5-option items, although for the reading items, the fourth distractors were rather more successful than the third.
As can be seen the figures were very close for the structure items and a one-way ANOVA detected no significant differences (F = 0.614 p > 0.05; df = 2, 90).
Similar(43)
A one-way ANOVA conducted on the three sets of individual structure item values found no significant difference between them (F = 1.360, p > 0.05, df = 2, 90).
Table 3 The approach of Cognitive, Emotional, Behavioral structure Item Contents Cognitive approach It uses mainly cognitive stimuli based on the robot's sensory information.
The 13-item QuIKS was evaluated for its factor structure, item- and person-fit, item's category response structure, differential item functioning by sex and obesity status, local item dependency, unidimensionality, and test precision.
In the assessment of the hypothesized scale structure item-convergent validity was confirmed for majority of items in the five hypothesized scales.
Unlike the previous factor structure, item 7 (employers) loaded onto the first factor whilst item 2 (people in my neighbourhood) loaded onto the second factor.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com