Repeat frequencies across the different motif lengths showed very strong significant differences between groups, exhibiting an inverse relationship with the repeat frequency decreasing as motif length increased (H = 846.4, P < 0.0001; see Table 2, Fig. 5).
Measured values for the quantitative analysis, TBRmax and TBRmean, showed strong significant differences between groups sorted by visual analysis.
Labels of Brodmann's area numbers are provided to indicate several channels where strong significant differences were confirmed.
Even after adjusting for age, gender, number of failing organs, and APACHE II score, an increase of LBP at 48 hours continued to predict a higher mortality risk (adjusted OR: 2.76; 95% CI: 1.16 6.54, P = 0.018).Kaplan-Meier 28-day survival curves showed strong significant differences between patients with or without increases in LBP levels at 48 hours (log rank test, P = 0.0001) (Figure 4).
PC1 and PC2 did not exhibit strong significant differences.
As expected, there were strong significant differences between the groups concerning all anthropometrical variables and BMR.
However, there were no differences in income level and those having a family physician, but there were strong significant differences in other risk factors (table V).
Nevertheless, using the current definitions we found strong significant differences in age and gender between PT OA and NT cases, as reported in other studies.
In addition, we show strong significant differences between survivors and nonsurvivors in serum levels of MCP-1, MIP-1α and IL-8.
Figure 5A shows that while the proportions were not significantly different (p = 0.005) for the Copia, Mutator and Harbinger elements, there were marginally significant differences for the L1 and CACTA TEs, and strong significant differences for the remaining superfamilies.
