Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
Fuzzy scales were introduced as a transition between weak scales and strong scales.
In Figure 8 we see that Reeber strong scales efficiently, although its performance begins to plateau at large numbers of MPI processes, due to the relatively small problem size (a 5123 problem domain).
The subscales Daily Activities and Psychosocial Functioning were identified as strong scales, with Hs = 0.84 and Hs = 0.54, respectively.
For the Motor and Cognitive scales, the H coefficient was 0.82 and 0.65, respectively, once again reflecting strong scales.
In the four-factor solution, once again H coefficient values for each subscale were high, ranging from 0.67 to 0.82, indicative of strong scales.
It should be noted that strong scales and, especially, values of Hs greatly exceeding 0.50 are very rare in Mokken scales and very high values of H should be treated with caution and may indicate violations of LSI [ 11].
Similar(53)
Figure 12 Strong scaling relation.
Figure 5 Weak and strong scaling.
The results revealed strong scale-dependency.
In physics, fractals show strong scaling symmetries.
Please see "Strong scaling: comparison with DistArray" section for discussion.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com