Sentence examples for strong median from inspiring English sources

As shown in Additional file 8: Figure S5B, the synergistic effect of combination treatment was very strong (median CI, 0.029 ± 1.83 for MDA-MB-361-LR cells, and 0.204 ± 5.74 for JIMT-1 cells).

Intersite correlations were strong (median r ≥ 0.84) for secondary pollutants (PM2.5, SO42–, NO3–, and O3), suggestive of low spatiotemporal heterogeneity for these pollutants over the area covered by the available monitors.

Indoor/outdoor ratios were close to 1.0 for PAHs and hopanes, and indoor outdoor correlations were strong (median R was 0.60 for PAH species and 0.74 for hopane species) (Arhami et al. 2010).

Based on the definition of four different poly(A) site categories (i.e., constitutive, strong, median and weak poly(A) sites, see the section Materials and Methods for definition), the numbers and percentages of the four different PAC sites and corresponding genes are shown in Table 3.

Different aspects of the morphology, for example, the morphology of the great appendage and the presence of a basipod with strong median armature on the biramous appendages indicate that L. superlata was an active and agile necto-benthic predator (not a scavenger or deposit feeder as previously interpreted).

The Finger Lakes region had the strongest median credit rating at A1. County credit-ratings range from the best, Aaa, to the worst, Baa3.

Therefore targets in first quantile (Q1) have the 25% weakest expressed median intensities and Q4 corresponds to the targets having 25% strongest median intensities.

However, if an additional cis-regulation was present, cis-effect sizes were stronger (median difference of explained variance of transcript levels was 0.11%, Wilcoxon test P < 10−15).

For the two considered samples the change of the non-specific contribution clearly dominates the observed change of the median chip intensity resulting in a stronger median signal of the scg-sample.

When the 3rd quartile of SNAI2/SLUG expression (37.75) was used for classification into high vs. low patients, the differences in OS were even stronger (median OS 4.6 vs 11.5 months, p = .0192, HR 0.45).

IHC staining intensity in seventeen GBM samples represented by matched tumor core and invasive rim from the same sample were evaluated by a pathologist (S.N .. Invasive glioma cells were found to exhibit significantly stronger median immuno-positivity for CTGF than stationary core cells (P = 0.025).