There is no grammatically correct way to use "strong expense" as a phrase in a sentence. The word "expense" is usually used as a noun to refer to the cost of something. You can describe an expense as being "strong" if it is significant or substantial, but it would not be used as a standalone phrase. Instead, it would be incorporated into a sentence like "The company's strong expenses led to a decrease in profits."
Still, the company, the country's largest retail chain, reported that net income had increased 5.7 percent because of what it called "strong expense management," among other things.
In addition to "strong expense management," Mr. Duke said, Wal-Mart was getting inventory levels under control, while better sales at Sam's Club and Wal-Mart's international division also contributed to the healthier bottom line.
[C1.] Merrill Lynch Says Quarterly Profit Rose 25% Merrill Lynch reported a 25percentt increase in fourth-quarter earnings on the back of robust trading, a surge in banking and strong expense controls.
"Revenue collections remain strong, although expenses edged up this year after two years of relatively small growth in costs".
Our growth recipe contained three main ingredients: custom software, strong partnerships and expense flexibility.
If they get their way, they will protect the strong at the expense of the weak ― rewarding the rich and the healthy in ways that punish the poor and the sick.
The police, the army and the ruling party are growing stronger, at the expense of such state institutions as parliament and the courts.
"And they would have to be superhuman not to feel hurt by that, particularly when it is the bank that has gotten stronger at their expense".
"Sometimes, sport can, instead of challenging what is discriminatory, contribute to it and make it stronger, at the expense of fair play".
For example, when 2 neurons project with equal strength to the same postsynaptic neuron, small differences in coincident firing will, through positive feedback, cause one connection to become stronger at the expense of the other (Song et al. 2000).
The relationship between cross-sectional area and mitochondrial density implies that a muscle fiber can hypertrophy (and become stronger) at the expense of its maximum steady state power per fiber volume (i.e., endurance capacity).
