Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Always striving for unanimity creates a false sense of certainty that we know more than we actually do.
In attempting to secure the court's position as the interpreter of the law and the Constitution (largely according to Federalist Party principles), Chief Justice Marshall discouraged the writing of seriatim (separate) opinions, delivered the opinion of the court in most major cases, and strove for unanimity among his colleagues.
There are videos in which you can see Bernstein striving for that unanimity, and it is not always pleasant to watch.
Under such a rule, parties should strive to seek unanimity, but settle for near-complete agreement after every effort has been made to meet everyone's interests.
Many economists, themselves, long for unanimity.
conclusion holds for unanimity rule (rule by consensus).
After this, the findings were discussed by the whole research group, for unanimity and verified validity.
We don't vote, as such, and complete unanimity is not required, but we strive for positions that the group can support.
Strive for that.
I strive for balance.
Do not strive for perfection.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com