Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
For all but the most stringent nominalists, then, the only objection can be that the ontology is too rich, too fine-grained.
Similar(59)
Today, most people are nominalists.
Thoroughgoing nominalists would withhold this concession, as Roscelin, a medieval nominalist, is said to have done.
Rationing must be stringent.
Other nominalists, so-called "trope" nominalists, follow the American philosopher Donald Cary Williams in positing an extra kind of part for things.
Some states are more stringent.
The nominalists thought they were doing God a favor, by recognizing his power.
Most nominalists, however, have not been able to dismiss the argument for universals so easily.
Others are less stringent.
That seems too stringent.
That stringent ideal stuck.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com