Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
The question of differences in editorial stringency between content filed by journalists for use on TV, in print and the more fluid medium of the web (and blogs) has become a hot topic of late.
FACETS allows for raw marks to be adjusted for differences in stringency between examiners.
The proximity of the Transcript counting 3′ end (TC 3′ end) and an Ensembl transcript were filtered at a high stringency (between -100 and +100 bases) or low stringency (between -100 and +5000 bases) (row 5).
The screening process was monitored by ELASA, which reflected the binding stringency between screened ssDNA library and target protein.
There was no obvious difference in binding stringency between the eighth round (OD405 = 0.59 ± 0.031) and the tenth round (OD405 = 0.634 ± 0.022).
As shown in Figure 2(a), the binding stringency between the ssDNA pool and GP73 gradually increased in small quantities before the fourth round (OD405 = 0.225 ± 0.014).
Similar(54)
This suggested that at stringencies between 10−6 and 10−10, the reduction in peaks and genes identified was reflecting a simple truncation of the number of calls rather than increasing, biologically relevant discrimination.
After an initial low stringency comparison between AD and normal samples within each data set (fold change (Fc)≥1.4 and unpaired nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test, p≤0.22), subsequent analyses for differentially transcribed genes between AD and normal samples at Fc≥2.0 and adjusted p-value≤0.1 (unpaired nonparametric test with Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate adjustment) were performed.
Interestingly, in addition to the difference of regulatory stringency presented between EAF1-WNT4-EAF1 loop and EAF2/U19-WNT4-EAF2/U19 loop, we also noticed that the response elements in Wnt4 promoter accounting for EAF gene suppression might not be the same based on the promoter and ChIP assays.
Also, we used the command line version of cd-hit-454 (v. 4.6, Li and Godzik, 2006; Niu et al., 2010) to cluster our shotgun data at different stringency settings (between 91% and 100%), where 98% is the default stringency in cd-hit-454.
This distribution is also affected by the consensus threshold used for indel extraction, which was chosen here to maximize the balance between stringency and sensitivity and is thus a compromise between the two.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com