striking to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "striking to" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express something that is impressive or noteworthy, but it is not a standard expression. Example: "The painting was striking to everyone who saw it."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Flower is striking to behold.

The New York Times - Magazine

I feel we're striking to represent all healthcare colleagues.

The Guardian

I'm not striking to look at in any way.

The New York Times - Arts

Furthermore, the relative lack of racial diversity is striking to newcomers.

The New York Times

But the statement that it makes about Fox's stability is striking to some onlookers.

The New York Times

He demonstrated a well-rounded game, transitioning smoothly from striking to grappling, and outclassed Pettis throughout.

Independent

It was striking to watch them come onstage and deliver their acceptance speeches.

The New Yorker

What was striking to me through the season's first weekend was just how little has changed.

The New York Times

But what is striking to me is how the BBC has handled Iran's actions.

The Guardian - Opinion

"But it was striking to see, with a normal copy edit, how totally different it was.

The Guardian - Film

The film likewise progresses from striking to morbid to melodramatic and false.

The Guardian - Film

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "striking to". Instead, use "striking for" or rephrase the sentence to use a more appropriate adjective like "impressive", "remarkable", or "noteworthy".

Common error

The most common error is using "to" instead of "for" after "striking". Always use "striking for" to correctly indicate what makes something impressive or remarkable.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "striking to" functions as an adjective attempting to describe something impressive or noticeable. However, it's grammatically questionable. As Ludwig AI points out, this phrase is not considered standard English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

25%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Social Media

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "striking to" is frequently encountered, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates that it's not a standard expression. It's best to use ""striking for"" or alternative phrases like "impressive to", "remarkable to", or "noteworthy to". Pay attention to the preposition used after "striking" to ensure grammatical correctness, especially in formal contexts. The prevalence of this phrase despite its incorrectness highlights the importance of careful proofreading and attention to grammatical detail.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

striking for

Corrects the grammar by using the correct preposition to describe what makes something striking.

impressive to

Replaces "striking" with a more common and grammatically sound adjective.

remarkable to

Similar to impressive, but with a slightly stronger connotation of being noteworthy.

noteworthy to

Emphasizes the quality of deserving attention or being recorded.

noticeable to

Indicates something easily observed or attracting attention.

apparent to

Suggests something is easily understood or perceived.

obvious to

Indicates something is easily seen or understood without needing explanation.

clear to

Implies something is easily perceived or understood.

evident to

Highlights that something is clearly visible or obvious.

telling to

Suggests something is revealing or significant.

FAQs

What's the correct way to use "striking" in a sentence?

The word "striking" typically requires the preposition "for" to indicate the reason for being striking. For example, "The sunset was "striking for" its vibrant colors" is correct.

Is "striking to" grammatically correct?

No, "striking to" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It's better to use ""striking for"" or an alternative like "impressive to".

What can I say instead of "striking to"?

You can use alternatives such as "impressive to", "remarkable to", or "noteworthy to", depending on the specific context.

What's the difference between "striking for" and "striking to"?

"Striking for" is grammatically correct and indicates the reason something is striking. "Striking to" is generally considered incorrect; alternatives like "impressive to" are preferred.