We can notice that road tolls are not strictly the same as road pricing reform, since tolls are typically route specific.
V can be expressed as {mathbf{V}} = (E_{1} angle theta_{1}, ldots,E_{i} angle theta_{i},R_{1} + {text{j}}X_{1}, ldots,R_{i} + {text{j}}X_{i} ) (6 As can be seen from (6), the accurate reactive power sharing is difficult to be implemented with the conventional droop control scheme unless the impedance of distribution lines is strictly the same as (7).
Moreover, clinical variables explaining non-pharmacological treatments are not strictly the same as for medications, which reflects the use of different patient characteristics for adjusting different components of care.
Schools and teachers can easily do the same, as well as making sure that "no bullying" policies are not only in place but strictly enforced.
Of course, it remains true that God cannot have ideas that are, strictly speaking, the same as ours.
As a result, the average power required for a given real outage may not strictly be the same as the original average power based on which the power codebook is designed.
Equation 3 formally proves that y T x 1 has strictly the same PAPR as the original SC-FDMA signal y T x 0, and the simulation results are reproduced in Figure 3. Figure 3 The distribution of the instantaneous normalized power (INP): SC-FDMA, SC-SFBC, classical SFBC, OFDMA.
In their rabbit model, the graft was not strictly the same size as the defect because of the blade thickness of the chisel used to take the graft.
We introduced the notion of "relative agreement" to detect those injections (RA = 30%) which are not strictly the same doses as calculated by the computer, but can be considered acceptable with a degree of tolerance of one unit.
All images for a respective ECM marker were obtained with strictly the same parameters such as signal intensity and duration of exposure.
This led some to the claim that "analysis is falsification", and even to hold that when we judge that a is the father of b, and judge that a is the son of c, the a in the first judgment is not strictly speaking the same a as involved in the second judgment; instead, in the first we deal only with a-quâ-father-of-b in the first, and a-quâ-son-of-c in the second (cf. BReal, 89; MTT, 140).
