Sentence examples for strictly prefer from inspiring English sources

Both of the others strictly prefer $A$ to $B$, though, and that is the social preference: with this profile in the domain, $3$ is no dictator.

There has in every case to be some group of individuals, the oligarchs, such that the society always strictly prefers one alternative to another if all of the oligarchs strictly prefer it, but never does so if that would go against the strict preference of any oligarch.[5] A dictatorship, in Arrow's sense, is a liberum veto oligarchy of one.

Whereas, at the segregated equilibria, I strictly prefer to go to the town in which I'm the majority.

In particular, I assume that agents are white lie averse: they strictly prefer to tell the truth whenever lying has no effect on their material payoff.

These hospitals get a positive surplus and strictly prefer personalized medicine to the standard treatment.

Notice that the low prevalence hospitals strictly prefer the standard treatment.

Then we will be on the lookout for a social welfare function $f$ that derives a strict social preference for $T$ above $S$ when everybody strictly prefers $T$ to $S$, but a strict preference for $S$ above $T$ when everyone is indifferent between these states.

This brings us to the Transitivity axiom, which says that if an option \(B\) is at least as preferable as \(A\), and \(C\) is at least as preferable as \(B\), then \(A\) cannot be strictly preferred to \(C\).

We may assume for the sake of the example that Ann always strictly prefers having more for herself to having less, and that Bob's preferences are similarly self-interested, so that in all admissible profiles Ann strictly prefers $T$ to $S$, while Bob strictly prefers $S$ to $T$.

More precisely, a state of affairs x is said to be Pareto-inefficient (or suboptimal) if and only if there is some state of affairs y such that no one strictly prefers x to y and at least one person strictly prefers y to x.

We prove in a general environment that there is a nontrivial set of parameters for which the principal strictly prefers not to be fully informed, regardless of the equilibrium played.