Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

strictly limited

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"strictly limited" is an appropriate and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to describe a situation in which there is a definite or prescribed measure of something that can not be increased or exceeded. For example, "The number of tickets available for the concert are strictly limited, so purchase them soon if you want to attend."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Admission was strictly limited.

News & Media

The New York Times

(Ale consumption, for instance, was strictly limited).

News & Media

The New York Times

Moreover, technological innovation is strictly limited.

News & Media

Independent

There have been books strictly limited to obscenity.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Its relevance for understanding China, therefore, is strictly limited.

Her program is strictly limited to high-risk families.

The effects of colour are brilliant, but strictly limited.

News & Media

Independent

This season though, the winger's chances have been strictly limited.

News & Media

Independent

Perhaps inevitably, Wenger's appetite for such sparring was strictly limited.

News & Media

Independent

The ECB has offered valuable but strictly limited help.

News & Media

The Economist

It was highly stratified, and social mobility was strictly limited.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "strictly limited", ensure the context clearly defines what is being limited and the reason for the limitation. This adds clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

While grammatically correct, "strictly limited" can sound overly formal in casual conversation. Opt for simpler alternatives like "limited" or "restricted" to maintain a natural tone in informal settings.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "strictly limited" functions as an adverb-adjective combination. It modifies a noun, emphasizing the intensity and enforcement of the limitation. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is appropriate and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Encyclopedias

25%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "strictly limited" is a frequently used and grammatically correct phrase that effectively conveys a sense of firm restriction. Ludwig AI confirms its usability across various writing contexts. Predominantly found in news, encyclopedic, and scientific sources, it emphasizes clarity and enforcement of constraints. For alternative phrasing, consider "severely restricted" or "rigidly controlled". When employing "strictly limited", ensure the context clearly defines the limitation to avoid ambiguity. While it's widely appropriate, remember that simpler alternatives might better fit informal settings.

FAQs

How can I use "strictly limited" in a sentence?

You can use "strictly limited" to indicate that something is subject to firm and unyielding restrictions. For example, "Access to the facility is strictly limited to authorized personnel" or "The budget for the project is strictly limited, so we must be mindful of our expenses".

What are some alternatives to "strictly limited"?

Alternatives include "severely restricted", "rigidly controlled", or "closely regulated", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "strictly limited" and "limited"?

"Strictly limited" emphasizes a higher degree of constraint compared to just "limited". "Limited" simply means there is a restriction, while "strictly limited" implies that the restriction is firm and not easily bypassed.

Which is more appropriate: "strictly limited" or "absolutely limited"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "strictly limited" is more common and generally preferred. "Absolutely limited" is less frequently used and might sound slightly more emphatic, but "strictly limited" conveys the same meaning effectively.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: