The phrase "strictly equal" is correct and commonly used in written English, especially in formal contexts such as mathematics, computer programming, and legal documents.
It means that two things are exactly the same and there is no room for variation or interpretation. Example: "According to the terms of the contract, the two companies must provide goods and services that are strictly equal in quality and quantity."
Experimental results reveal that both center frequency and bandwidth of the proposed digital graphic equalizer are strictly equal to the desired ones, and the average gain error decreases at least 2 dB.
Spending in 2013 must be strictly equal to 2012 spending.
And, as I'd start the fugue, just as the dust was settling from the final low chord of the previous movement, she said, "Every crotchet is strictly equal!
In practice, the noise signal measured by the guard detector is not strictly equal to the noise contribution into the first detector due to anisotropic biases.
The winners of the £10,000 award - carved as always in two strictly equal portions between the author and translator – will be announced on 20 May.
"Slower and slower as Bach goes down the chromatic scale, down into the lowest pits of despair". (She then quoted the last few lines of Wordsworth's "Intimations of Immortality"). And, as I'd start the fugue, just as the dust was settling from the final low chord of the previous movement, she said, "Every crotchet is strictly equal!
Here, the correct ratio of code length means when the code length estimation result strictly equals (1 × 10− 6/10) × f ADC = 200 points, we regard that the estimation result is correct.
Hence, although pcl never strictly equals 1 as long as some randomness occurs in a WTSN (pocc < 1), for practical applications, the probability pcl can be supposed to be about 1 since a node density would be chosen such that pocc is reasonably larger than the respective p c for ensuring network connectivity.
In the contrasting case of the one supremely excellent person, Aristotle argues that such a person has, strictly speaking, no equals, and so cannot be made justly to take his turn in rule as one citizen among others.
Symonds does not differentiate strictly between age-equal and age-inconsistent relationships in this text, but emphasises that regulations were in place to ensure that male same-sex relations "did not degenerate into mere licentiousness" or "wanton and illiberal passion".
Therefore, it is important to know for which the constant is equal or strictly greater than one.
