Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "strictly considered" is correct and usable in written English.
It is usually used in the context of a formal discussion or argument when attempting to define or analyze a concept. For example: "Strictly considered, there is no such thing as a perfect crime."
Exact(26)
The Global Positioning System is not strictly considered part of the Internet, but it is a close cousin.
Every detail has been strictly considered, including the decisive punctuation: "although I cannot see you / and will not again".
Instead, he is running — well, O.K., walking — the New York City Marathon on Sunday, having procured his racing essentials: petroleum jelly to keep his feet and thighs from chafing, adhesive bandages to prevent his nipples from bleeding and a finish-line beverage that is not strictly considered a sports drink.
Some aspects such as orientation, openings, exposure to atmospheric agents and natural elements must also be strictly considered.
To achieve a high precision of parts, especially the required bending angle, a suitable design of process parameters is strictly considered.
It is worth noting that the presence of a test frame indicates that in that frame a BG subtraction issue occurs; therefore, the rest of the sequence cannot be strictly considered as an instance of a BG subtraction problem.
Similar(34)
In those studies, the common characters of the data used have revealed a lack of generalization of analyzed earthquakes and the localization of the recording area, without strictly considering the site categories.
Our analysis does not strictly consider a multi-user environment, but this assumption is reasonable even in this case since all other users have been at least partially canceled.
Strictly considering this limit of −100 mV, only 3 4 studies meet the requirements for anaerobic conditions (Ali et al. [2], Lamshöft et al. [41], Widyasari-Mehta et al. [76], Zheng et al. [81]).
But if we wanted to strictly consider physical studies and value them in order that the real advantage is gained, against how many sciences could we bring the same arguments with which we are judging this and other parts of natural history?
While Wolfers might not strictly consider himself a DJ, we've seen him play out, and we'd politely disagree.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com