Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(42)
Consider the following acts: Now suppose: Then Less formally (and stated in terms of strict preference): if you prefer to stake the prize \(X\) on \(f\) rather than \(f'\), you must consider \(E\) more probable than \(F\).
Then we will be on the lookout for a social welfare function $f$ that derives a strict social preference for $T$ above $S$ when everybody strictly prefers $T$ to $S$, but a strict preference for $S$ above $T$ when everyone is indifferent between these states.
There has in every case to be some group of individuals, the oligarchs, such that the society always strictly prefers one alternative to another if all of the oligarchs strictly prefer it, but never does so if that would go against the strict preference of any oligarch.[5] A dictatorship, in Arrow's sense, is a liberum veto oligarchy of one.
How many would have a strict preference for Diet Coke?
How many would have a strict preference for Coke?
Then assuming the transitivity of the strict preference, the underlying partial confidence relations are those at work in non-monotonic inference and thus satisfy one of the main properties of possibility theory.
Similar(17)
The result holds when agents have strict preferences over individual objects.
Each agent has unit demand, and has strict preferences over the objects.
We show that there exist two Nash implementable social choice correspondences defined on an environment with strict preferences for which the intersection is not Nash implementable.
Here Pathak and Sethuraman uncover that single and multiple lottery mechanisms are equivalent for the problem of allocating students to schools in which students have strict preferences and the schools are indifferent.
WP requires $f$ to respect unanimous strict preferences.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com