The phrase "strict intention" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is often used to describe someone's determined and specific purpose or aim. Example: The company's strict intention is to reduce their carbon footprint by 50% within the next year.
We will calculate responders to treatment and remitters on a strict intention-to-treat (ITT) basis and we will include dropouts in this analysis.
Following the strict intention-to-treat principle, missing data were supplemented by the last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) method even when a participant dropped out before the first post-baseline rating.
Data were analyzed according to strict intention-to-treat (sITT) analysis according to Herman et al. (2009).
However, a strict intention-to-treat analysis will also be performed, including all patients, regardless of whether they have a complete echo data set or not.
Strict intention-to-treat analysis is often hard to achieve for two main reasons missing outcomes for some participants and non-adherence to the trial protocol.
The MITT analysis differed from a strict intention-to-treat (ITT) population because it excluded infants who were randomized but never vaccinated since these infants were not followed for efficacy outcomes.
The treatment cohorts at the time of the original randomised treatment assignment were maintained for the entire 21-year period of follow-up and a strict intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was undertaken.
A few respondents who were much younger than the intended inclusion age made it necessary to relax the strict intention-to-treat approach and exclude these untargeted extreme outliers.
Sensitivity analyses were performed to test our assumption that inclusion of studies without strict intention-to-treat analysis did not significantly alter results compared to exclusion of these studies.
