Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(16)
For comparisons between comparable design codes, the design strengths M d of KSSC KCI, Eurocode 4, and JSCE 2009 were divided by the nominal strength M pl,AISC of AISC 360-10 (see M pl of Table 5).
It is noted that, for comparisons between comparable design codes, the design strengths M d of KSSC KCI, Eurocode 4, and JSCE 2009 were divided by the nominal strength M pl,AISC of AISC 360-10 (see M pl of Table 3).
As shown in Fig. 7, the design strengths M d of KSSC KCI and Eurocode 4 were about 10%% greater than those of AISC 360-10.
The design moment strengths M c computed using the ACI design code formulation were safe and close to those computed using experimental results.
Table 5 compares the design moment strengths M d of the interior and exterior composite beams under negative bending, calculated by the PSDM specified in each design code.
Figure 7 shows the variation of the design strengths M d of KSSC KCI, Eurocode 4, and JSCE 2009 according to steel yield strengths, F yk.
Similar(44)
The fabric strengths (M-index) of samples are listed in Table 1.
Figure 9 Magnetic strength M as a function of laser pulse repetition rate.
We employed two modes of prediction: through the correction factor (C f ) and through the residual strength (M res ).
The beam resistance and action are computed using the design strength M c and the external bending moment M e, respectively.
Figure 9 shows the typical variations of magnetic strength M as a function of laser repetition rate for the NdFeB nanofibers grown at room temperature.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com