Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
Female headed households are very different from their male counterparts, and 300 of them were in a stratum without any control observation.
For 4 additional APs (chlorpromazine, cyamemazine, olanzapine, and quetiapine), disproportion found by crude ROR persisted only in the stratum without concomitant AZCERT drugs, also after adjustment.
Significant social and demographic variables were tested in the models, as well as a term for stratum, without elimination of non-significant variables.
Aripiprazole and paliperidone showed significant disproportion only in the stratum without concomitant AZCERT drugs, before and after the adjustment.> -wrap-foot> Sertinever (never marketed) and thioridazine (no longer available in the USA) are not shown.
Based on our criteria, the following potential signals of torsadogenicity were found: amisulpride (25 cases; adjusted ROR in the stratum without AZCERT drugs = 43.94, 95%% CI 22.82 84.60), cyamemazine (11; 15.48, 6.87 34.91), and olanzapine (189; 7.74, 6.45 9.30).
A potential signal of torsadogenicity was defined if a drug met all the following criteria: (a) four or more cases in group 1+2; (b) significant ROR in group 1+2 that persists through the cumulative approach; (c) significant adjusted ROR for group 1+2 in the stratum without AZCERT drugs; (d) not included in AZCERT lists (as of June 2011).
Similar(53)
This may simply reflect the difficulty of recognizing soil strata without the root traces so obvious in much younger rocks.
Such pathology is extremely rare in this age range, 10/290 in the equivalent 36 50 year age strata without CJD18, P = 0.0002, Fisher's test.
Thus rock strata C1 C5−1 is rock strata without deformation pressure.
(2) Determination of rock strata without deformation pressure.
sumlimits_{i = 1}^{{5^{ - 1} }} {left( {Delta_{j} } right)}_{i} = Delta_{text{d}} Thus rock strata C1 C5−1 is rock strata without deformation pressure.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com