Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(26)
Thus, in this way, it was not possible to tell which ranking strategy retrieved which image.
The search strategy retrieved 716 citations, 23 qualified for full-text review and eight were further excluded.
The initial search strategy retrieved 532 publications.
The search strategy retrieved 151 unique citations.
The search strategy retrieved 2714 articles.
The search strategy retrieved 770 citations.
Similar(34)
The search strategies retrieved 1,612 records, after deduplication 1,418 records remained, with the majority of records (1,271) sourced from MEDLINE.
The systematic review based on all the stated strategies retrieved a total of 256 abstracts.
The search strategies retrieved 1,734 citations; 128 were selected and assessed.
One extreme case was found in which all three search strategies missed a number of included items[ 28] however, in the case with the most included studies indexed in MEDLINE (n = 103), all three search strategies retrieved all 103 items[ 29].
The search strategy initially retrieved 486 records of which only 10 articles were selected for inclusion in the final review.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com