Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(43)
"⇒": Assume that the SCF f is strategy proof.
The mechanism is proved to be strategy proof and efficient.
Let an SCF f be strategy proof and efficient.
"⇐": Let us choose a strategy proof and efficient SCF f.
Let SCF f be strategy proof and efficient.
It is available if the procedure is coherent or locally strategy proof.
Similar(17)
In general, merging operators are not strategy-proof when Hamming distance is used, whereas they are strategy-proof when the drastic distance is employed.
A dictatorship, which always chooses the dictator's most preferred alternative, is trivially strategy-proof.
Our finding is that the market-wise adaptation of strategy-proof and non-wasteful rules yields a strategy-proof rule with the following efficiency property: no strategy-proof rule Pareto-dominates the rule.
Hence, we find support for the argument that a strategy-proof mechanism "levels the playing field".
Strategy-proof mechanisms eliminate the possibility for gain from strategic misrepresentation of preferences.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com