Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

straightforward justification for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "straightforward justification for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when you want to indicate a clear and uncomplicated reason or explanation for something. Example: "The researcher provided a straightforward justification for the methodology chosen in the study."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

In one sense, it seems quite straightforward to give a deductive justification for some favored set of rules of inference.

Science

SEP

(While the thermodynamic justification for these latter calculations is straightforward, it is a somewhat novel approach to calculating the optimal length and thus worth testing by independent calculations).

Science

eLife

Justification for Buying a Kindle.

News & Media

The New York Times

There is no justification for terror".

News & Media

Independent

There is no real justification for this.

News & Media

Independent

There can be no justification for it".

News & Media

The New York Times

We have no justification for it.

News & Media

The New Yorker

"There is no objective justification for it.

There is no justification for this.

News & Media

The New York Times

There is no justification for murder.

News & Media

Independent

Sometimes there is justification for our frustration.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "straightforward justification for", ensure the context genuinely reflects a clear and uncomplicated reason. Avoid using it ironically or when the justification is, in reality, complex or convoluted.

Common error

Avoid using "straightforward justification for" when the underlying reasons are multi-layered or require significant expertise to understand. This can mislead your audience and undermine your credibility.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

78%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "straightforward justification for" functions as a noun phrase, typically used to introduce or describe a reason, explanation, or rationale that is presented as being clear, simple, and easily understood. Since Ludwig AI confirmed its usability, this implies a recognition of its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "straightforward justification for" is a grammatically correct noun phrase used to introduce reasons or explanations that are clear and uncomplicated. Ludwig AI confirms its usability. While examples are currently missing, the phrase's semantic transparency allows for straightforward application across various contexts. When writing, ensure the actual justification aligns with the implied simplicity to maintain credibility. Alternative phrases like "clear rationale for" or "simple reason for" offer similar meanings with slightly different emphases.

FAQs

How can I use "straightforward justification for" in a sentence?

Use "straightforward justification for" to introduce a clear and uncomplicated reason or explanation. For example, "The company provided a straightforward justification for the price increase."

What's a good alternative to "straightforward justification for"?

Alternatives include "clear rationale for", "simple reason for", or "obvious justification for", depending on the nuance you wish to convey.

Is there a difference between "straightforward justification for" and "simple justification for"?

While similar, "straightforward justification for" implies clarity and directness, whereas "simple justification for" emphasizes a lack of complexity. The best choice depends on which aspect you want to highlight.

When is it appropriate to use "straightforward justification for" in writing?

It's appropriate when the reason or explanation is genuinely easy to understand and doesn't involve complex reasoning or hidden assumptions. Avoid using it if the topic requires in-depth knowledge or detailed analysis.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

78%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: