stops of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "stops of" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to specific locations or points in a journey, but it lacks context to be usable. Example: "The bus makes several stops of interest along the route."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

50 human-written examples

Civil rights advocates have assailed the department's expanded stops of minorities on the streets.

The New York Times

The analysis also showed that there were 132,000 stops of black men 16 to 24.

The New York Times

The only question is whether Eta stops of its own volition or because we force it".

Independent

This is a city of abrupt full stops, of journeys that lead nowhere.

The Guardian

More stops, of course, mean more chances for delays and a missed connection.

The New York Times

Mr. Ginger and a second monitor tracked troopers' stops of minority motorists for years.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

5 human-written examples

Some, like the Galaxy S6, have F-stops of 1.9.

The Guardian - Tech

The cars stopped, of course.

The New York Times

The full stop, of course".

The Guardian - Books

First stop, of course, is Google.

The Guardian - Film

She doesn't stop of course.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider using more precise alternatives such as "stops along", "stops at", or rephrasing to clarify the intended meaning.

Common error

Avoid using "stops of" when a clearer preposition like "at" or "along" would provide better context and prevent misinterpretation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "stops of" functions as a prepositional phrase, often intended to specify locations or points within a sequence or journey. However, it is often considered grammatically incorrect and can be replaced by clearer alternatives. Ludwig confirms that the phrase lacks clarity.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

54%

Science

27%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "stops of" is frequently encountered but is generally considered grammatically questionable. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase isn't correct and lacks a clear meaning in written English, often requiring rephrasing for clarity. While prevalent in various contexts, especially in News & Media and Science, more precise alternatives such as "stops along" or "stops at" are recommended for better communication. Therefore, while commonly used, writers should exercise caution and prefer grammatically sound alternatives to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

halts in

Replaces "stops" with "halts", emphasizing the act of pausing or ceasing movement within a sequence.

pauses during

Substitutes "stops" with "pauses", highlighting brief interruptions or breaks within an activity or process.

cessations of

Uses "cessations" instead of "stops", focusing on the act of bringing something to an end temporarily or permanently.

interruptions in

Replaces "stops" with "interruptions", emphasizing a disruption or interference in the flow of an activity.

breaks within

Uses "breaks" instead of "stops", focusing on short periods of rest or inactivity during a longer process.

stages of

Shifts the focus from halting to the different phases or steps within a process.

locations along

Emphasizes the physical places where pauses or halts occur during a journey or process.

points in

Focuses on specific moments or instances where something comes to a standstill.

occasions for halting

Rephrases to emphasize the opportunities or reasons for stopping an action.

instances of pausing

Rephrases to highlight specific moments when an activity is briefly interrupted.

FAQs

How can I rephrase a sentence using "stops of" to be more grammatically sound?

Consider replacing "stops of" with phrases like "stops along" or "stops at" depending on the context.

Is "stops of" grammatically correct?

The phrase "stops of" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's often better to use alternatives that provide more clarity.

What are some alternatives to "stops of" when referring to locations during a journey?

You can use phrases like "locations on the route" or "points of interest along the way" to describe places visited during travel.

In what contexts might "stops of" be used, even if it's not ideal?

While not grammatically ideal, "stops of" might appear in informal writing or speech, but it's generally recommended to use more precise language for clarity.