stipulate with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "stipulate with" is not commonly used in written English and may not be considered correct.
It is typically used in legal or formal contexts when discussing agreements or conditions, but "stipulate" is usually followed by "to" or "for" rather than "with." Example: "The parties involved will stipulate to the terms of the contract during the negotiation."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

"Rabbit Remembered" ends, as the laws of classical comedy stipulate, with the prospect of a marriage -- and also, true to form, with a sentence consisting of a single word.

The New York Times - Books

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

The painting will be provided for exhibition to the Japanese museum for four years on a rotating basis, according to the terms of the accord stipulated with the Italian culture ministry, along the lines of similar agreements that the ministry has with the Metropolitan Museum of Art, which returned several antiquities to Italy.

The New York Times

Stipulating with Dworkin that the preferences of the average member of the community should be the determining preferences in this exercise does not clarify the issue.

SEP

The rationale is to assign resource shares trying to minimize management costs (formed mainly by costs associated with energy consumption), while guaranteeing the fulfilment of SLAs stipulated with the customers.

Journal of Internet Services and Applications

Members of the family are usually readily recognizable even when sterile by their combination of fibrous bark, alternate stipulate leaves with toothed margins (the stipules are not sheathing), more or less palmate venation, and multicellular hairs that are stellate to scaly.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Now that I'm packing it -- as the new regulations stipulate -- with the empty plastic bottles from the apple juice my sons drink with reckless abandon, it's beginning to look more like a lowly park trash bin.

The New York Times

Having practiced cardiology in both full-time academia as well as several private practice settings for more than 20 years, I can stipulate this with almost absolute certainty.

The New York Times

Alex Koppelman points us to an interesting theory: the Polish Defense, which stipulates that with little time remaining and a touchdown required, you should send extra defenders onto the field intentionally, use your superior numbers to stop the play, and accept the five-yard penalty with a few more seconds ticked off the clock.

The New Yorker

Mr. Boehner and other House Republican leaders on Thursday embraced a bill stipulating that — with narrow exceptions — no federal money, subsidies or tax credits could be used to pay for abortion or for any health insurance plan that includes coverage of abortion.

The New York Times - Health

A Victorian field guide, for example, describes Agrimonia in rather uncompromising terms: "Herbs with stipulate, pinnate, serrate leaves and terminal bracteate spine-like racemes of small yellow flowers".

The Guardian - Books

The patient underwent right hemihepatectomy (stipulate + Sg1) with cholecystectomy and concurrent splenectomy owing to the growing aneurysm of the splenic artery.

Surgical Case Reports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

While you may encounter the phrase "stipulate with", it's generally more accurate and widely accepted to use "stipulate to" or "stipulate for" followed by the specific conditions or requirements.

Common error

Avoid using "stipulate with" as it's not standard English. Instead, opt for "stipulate to" when agreeing to terms, or rephrase to use a different verb entirely.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "stipulate with" functions primarily as a verb aiming to indicate that something has to be included as part of an agreement, although its usage is not considered grammatically sound. As Ludwig AI indicates, "stipulate" is more correctly paired with prepositions like 'to' or 'for'.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "stipulate with" is infrequently used and generally considered grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI points out, standard English prefers constructions like "stipulate to" or rephrasing the sentence entirely. While the intent is to formally set conditions or requirements, it's best to avoid this phrase in favor of more accepted alternatives like “specify” or “agree on”. The phrase appears in various contexts like news, science, and business, but its incorrect usage undermines its effectiveness. Prioritize correct grammar to ensure clarity in formal and informal communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

specify with

Focuses on providing detailed specifications rather than setting a formal condition.

set out with

Implies a clear articulation of terms or conditions.

establish with

Suggests a more general setting of ground rules or expectations.

provide with the condition

Adds explicit mention of a conditional clause.

agree upon with

Emphasizes mutual agreement rather than a unilateral setting of terms.

contract with the provision

More specific to legal contracts, highlighting a formal provision.

lay down with

Indicates a more forceful imposition of conditions.

establish in conjunction with

Highlights that the action happens at the same time.

determine with

Highlights the act of deciding something in conjunction with something else.

concur with the regulation

Implies mutual agreement with existing regulation

FAQs

What's a more common way to phrase something similar to "stipulate with"?

Instead of "stipulate with", consider using phrases like "agree on", "specify", or "set out", depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to use "stipulate with" in a sentence?

While you might find instances of "stipulate with", it's generally considered grammatically incorrect. The preferred constructions are "stipulate to" or rephrasing the sentence.

What does it mean to stipulate something?

To stipulate something means to specify or demand something as a condition of an agreement. It's often used in legal or formal contexts. For instance, the contract may specify that payment must be made within 30 days.

Which is more appropriate, "stipulate to" or "stipulate with"?

"Stipulate to" is the more appropriate and commonly accepted phrase. "Stipulate with" is less common and may be perceived as incorrect.