However, as more monocular depth cues were added to the stimulus the results approached those found when the scene contained stereoscopic cues.
As the first fixation was more often directed towards the preferred sexual stimulus, the results give preliminary evidence for this proposition.
However, unlike experiments that used novel animals as a stimulus, the results here showed an inconsistent pattern: a change in fear-related beliefs depended on both the particular situation, and on who was presenting the information.
Moreover, because we have shown that attentional load modulates V1 response associated with the presence (versus absence) of the invisible stimulus (namely, an interaction between load and V1 response to the invisible stimulus), the results clearly show specific effects of load on the neural processing of the invisible stimuli.
Since the olfactory signal was the same for both stimuli, the result clearly shows that males use visual cues or signals to discriminate between the two species of orchids.
It relies on the ability to simulate the design under test (DUT) with a specific input stimulus, observing the results of that stimulus on the design, and deciding if the results are correct.
As one potential source of altered emotional processing, neurocognitive models of PD have proposed information processing biases such as an attention shift towards fearful stimuli, with the result of physiological stimuli or otherwise non-fearful stimuli triggering overproportional anxiety [14].
It has been hypothesized before [ 17] that the type of applied stimulus influences the result.
One, FinalDoom, suggests that it's all down to priming, i.e. if you tell yourself something is going to happen, then present yourself with visual or auditory stimuli, the results could be skewed depending on the information you were primed with.
For the dark stimuli, the results of ES and CVR are not as clearly separated from those for ABW.
