Plants respond to a variety of external stimuli by utilizing hormones as controllers in a stimulus-response system.
According to the GO annotation, 68 upregulated genes were shown to be involved in stimulus response and immune system process (Table 2).
It is hypothesized that genes implicated in stimulus response and immune system process, cell wall and transcriptional regulation, and cellular and metabolism processes, such as starch and sucrose metabolism, glutathione metabolism, biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids, and plant hormones play major roles in the canker resistance of TG9.
After functional annotation and classification, the DEGs implicated in stimulus response and immune system process, cell wall and transcriptional regulation, and cellular and metabolism processes, such as starch and sucrose metabolism, glutathione metabolism, biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids, and plant hormones were hypothesized to play major roles in the canker resistance of TG9.
Based on the above discussion, and assuming the response system (stimulus → appreciation → response) according to Lazarus's stress model (Kosugi et al. 2002), we could suggest that the change in the external environment influenced the environmental appreciation of "deserted-dense" (Table 5).
By contrast, the functions overrepresented by LDSDS samples related to the sensory perception of smell, sensory perception of chemical stimulus, response to stimulus, neurological system process, and cognition, etc. Illustrative gene function diagrams corresponding to DHAS and LDSDS are given, respectively.
Collectively, this approach can be applied to evaluating possible effects of other matrices, substrates, culture architecture, and stimulus response on in vitro systems developed to recapitulate the brain in vivo.
The differentially expressed genes in the cluster of biological processes were found to be mainly related to stimulus response, immune response, regulation of immune system process, and regulation of development process.
According to the behaviorist doctrine that held sway at the time, animals were little more than "stimulus response automata," robots with a central nervous system.
So it's stimulus, response.
The results of NOA are shown in Additional file 7. The functions of the optimized IAV-induced IRN are enriched in the response to stimulus, immune system process, inflammatory response, response to wounding and positive regulation of cellular processes, which are similar to the results by employing DAVID.
