Sentence examples for stimulus regularity from inspiring English sources

Direct recording of LFPs reveals a representation of stimulus regularity in the evoked responses and induced gamma responses related to the perception of pitch.

This provides further support for the representation of stimulus regularity in neural ensembles in early auditory cortex that can be measured by AC.

The systematic effects of stimulus regularity and rate on the time-locked and induced responses are summarized in Figure 3 and Figure 4.

The study used a missing-fundamental stimulus, and the responses can be regarded as tuned in the domains of either stimulus regularity or perceived pitch.

Figure 3 shows significant increases in the regularity of the LFPs, as measured by AC, as a function of stimulus regularity in HG.

The present study shows that responses to both stimulus regularity and perceived pitch occur in neural ensembles in primary cortex and in an adjacent area.

While both children and adults benefited from the opportunity to use stimulus regularities to guide perceptual discriminations, both the proportion of individuals benefiting from stimulus regularities and the magnitude of the effect appear to increase with age (see Figure 3).

Our finding of an effect of hippocampal damage on this type of learning is consistent with the theory that the hippocampal formation is important for incremental learning of the latent structure of the world, such as stimulus regularities and environmental context [64].

According to this model, attention and prediction contain a common term, namely the a-priori expectation considering a-priori probability (i.e. probabilistic information delivered by the contingencies between cue and task-relevant stimuli) and rhythmic regularity (triggering expectations based on periodic stimulus presentation), thus interactions between attention and prediction should occur.

Figure 2 shows time-frequency analyses (Supplemental Experimental Procedures) to demonstrate induced responses to stimuli with fixed regularity and different rates.

The rationale behind this method is that the stimulus-specific refractoriness of deviant stimuli is approximately equal in the two types of sequences and that in the control sequence none of stimuli breaks the regularity.