Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
In order to stimulate testing behaviour an environment conducive to seeking such information must exist.
Similar(59)
However, many of the stimulated tests were carried out in the lab for a relatively short period of time.
Histopathological examination of corresponding cochlear sections comparing the stimulated test side with the unstimulated control side showed no significant difference (P>0.05) for either animals implanted with HiQ electrodes (n=6) or standard electrodes (n=2).
Nor were there any significant differences between the spiral ganglion cell density of the basal turn implanted with HiQ or standard electrodes for both the stimulated test (P=0.31) and the unstimulated control side (P=0.84).
Values close to clinical thresholds could be repeated or a more rigorous stimulated test (mixed-meal or glucagon tests) performed.
Any stimulated test is expensive and time consuming and thus may not provide benefits in clinical practice beyond a fasting or a random C-peptide measurement.
For the stimulated test, 1 μL (535 μmol/L) of PMA (Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, Cat. P8139, Sigma) was added.
The spread of C-peptide levels is wide and a high or very low level will exclude or confirm severe insulin deficiency; a fasted or stimulated test could then be conducted should the result be indeterminate.
A cut-off value of ≤ 80 min5 min for the stimulated test showed a sensitivity of 87.6%, specificity of 67.5%, positive predictive value of 55.7% and a negative predictive value of 7.8%.
Without a formal study using a fasting or random C-peptide value in addition to a stimulated test, it is not possible to determine which is more clinically meaningful in an individual subject.
Cut-off values for the unstimulated test (≤ 30 min5 min, ≤ 40 min5 min, ≤ 50 min5 min, ≤ 60 min5 min), and for the stimulated test (≤ 50 min5 min, ≤ 60 min5 min, ≤ 70 min5 min, ≤ 80 min5 min) were examined and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values and negative predictive values were calculated.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com