Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(4)
It is not in the nature of the subject for every connection to be proved with mathematical rigour, but, where this is lacking, experiment will frequently indicate what trust may be placed in the intuitive steps of the argument.
Both steps of the argument are, of course, highly contestable.
The visual experience reveals not only what the steps of the argument are but also that they are valid, thereby contributing to our grounds for accepting the argument and believing its conclusion.
While both steps of the argument are controversial, the second stage has come in for especially heavy fire (for a careful discussion of the dialectical significance of Jackson's argument, see Suikkanen 2010).
Similar(56)
As we shall see, there are a variety of features of morality that can be appealed to in the first steps of the arguments, as well as a variety of ways in which God might be thought to provide an explanation of those features in the second steps.
I know this for I purposely went in raw to the auditorium, not allowing myself to peek at the playscript: each step of the argument was intelligible.
The second step of the argument is the claim that necessarily coextensive properties are identical.
But unless each step of the argument is clearly and distinctly perceived, Descartes should not be making the argument.
In this way, the relative identity theorist is able to block the third step of the argument for coincident objects.
One can again see here a problem for pluralism, for the second step of the argument concludes that there are many places.
Third, the assumption that there is an ideally competitive insurance market postulated in the fourth step of the argument adds to the hypothetical nature of the argument as a whole.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com