In the next step of the study, the quantitative vulnerability of the structure was investigated.
For the next step of the study, the participants took a test that required them to pick out a particular person from a group of faces.
In addition, this study is performed at a constant temperature to exclude this parameter, at this step of the study.
In the first step of the study, we examined liquefaction of the material in a free-fall reactor.
The qualitative vulnerability of the building was evaluated in the first step of the study, indicating its high seismic vulnerability.
The first step of the study consisted of a measure campaign conducted by Avvenia to know more about the actual use of the building.
The final step of the study was the proposition of remedial actions in order to improve the pedestrian mobility and walkability across the examined streets.
The analytical calculations and methods are presented at each step of the study, whereas the CFD supportive computations are also shown in detail.
Experimental planning of each step of the study was separately carried out in accordance with design of experiment (DoE) based on Taguchi methodology.
The second step of the study consists in an analysis of each type of shock facility to identify their advantages and drawbacks.
In the first step of the study, the dogs were exposed to six different objects and watched as their owner carried out a previously unseen action with one of three of the items, such as climbing on a chair or touching an umbrella.
