This two-step interpretation presupposes that the subject has already learned rules for colour, size, shape, or similar dimensions.
Using information from the practical exercises, the figure allows a step-by-step interpretation to be built up of past landscapes, including an understanding of the nature of fluvial responses to Quaternary climate change, a reconstruction of the contemporary flora and mammalian fauna and an analysis of the activities of early human populations.
The diagnostic process involves three steps: interpretation, merging, and diagnosis generation.
The general steps for each of these markers involves pre-analytic (fixation, embedding, processing and sectioning), analytic (permeation, staining and visualization) and post-analytic steps (interpretation and diagnosis).
To analyze the results, we follow a step-by-step interpretation of the principal components: based firstly on the typology of the tumors, secondly on the gene expression signatures and then, on the associated biological knowledge.
Within this double-step interpretation of the data, cancellation of saccades is a natural behavioral phenomenon (another phenomenon associated with competition between alternative locations to which a saccade might be directed concerns saccadic curvature (e.g. Walker, McSorley, & Haggard, 2006), although saccadic trajectories were not assessed in the current study).
Evidence in relation to the second two proposed applications accrues through use of the tool, while the step from interpretation of data at the group level to interpretation at the individual level usually requires additional technical analysis as well as a body of evidence about the meaning and behavior of each scale acquired through widespread use with groups.
In the fifth step, the interpretation step, the researchers stimulate the participants to develop their own labels and interpretations for the various maps.
Step 3: Interpretation of the findings.
The identification of lineaments in magnetic anomaly data is an important step in interpretation.
STEP 8: (INTERPRETATION) [MAL pp. 64 65, LT (Chap. VI, esp. pp. 82 83)] expresses the proposition "All Y1 is Y2 or Y3," or equivalently, "All Y1 and not Y2 is Y3".
