Exact(19)
Pastures not burned in over 3 years had no new layering stems (P < 0.01) (Figure 3A).
A greater BMD decrease was found in Scientific Hip Prosthesis (Biomet, Bridgend, UK) and SPII CoCr stems (Link, Hamburg, Germany) than in Exeter (Howmedica, London, UK), Spectron (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tenn), and SPII Titanium stems (P <.05), and the stiffer SPII CoCr stems (Link) had a larger bone loss than the SPII Titanium stems (Link).
For the lateral stems (MSS), we found a 2-fold higher crude RR for revision due to aseptic loosening than for the standard stems (p = 0.02).
The crude RR for revision for aseptic loosening was higher (3.5) for the SL stems than for the MSS standard stems (p < 0.001), and stems made of Ti had a 3.6-fold higher RR than the Co stems (p < 0.001) (Table 5, see Supplementary data).
When comparing the rate of key complications as a function of component design we found a significantly higher incidence with the use of standard straight stems compared to the other different designed stems (P = 0.002).
Cancellous bone densification is associated with larger stems (P =.002).
Similar(41)
N content of various organs followed this order leaf > seed > stem; P content of various organs was seed > leaf > stem; K content was stem > leaf > seed; and Fe content was leaf > stem > seed.
There were also few differences among seed lots with respect to foliage and stem, with the exception that in year 4 of the trial, GF16S had more foliage (P = 0.05) than GF28C (Additional file 3) and in year 2, GF27S seedlings had more stem (P = 0.05) than did GF23C seedlings.
Using multiple regression analysis, the drilling of the stem was the only factor that significantly affected the retention force of the stem (p = 0.020).
A significantly lower PCr/ATP ratio was found in the basal ganglia when compared to both the brain stem (p < 0.05) and the cerebellum (p < 0.005).
Moreover, there was no difference in the gender of the students for the factors that ignited their initial interest in STEM (p > 0.2575).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com