Suggestions(1)
Exact(12)
N content of various organs followed this order leaf > seed > stem; P content of various organs was seed > leaf > stem; K content was stem > leaf > seed; and Fe content was leaf > stem > seed.
There were also few differences among seed lots with respect to foliage and stem, with the exception that in year 4 of the trial, GF16S had more foliage (P = 0.05) than GF28C (Additional file 3) and in year 2, GF27S seedlings had more stem (P = 0.05) than did GF23C seedlings.
Moreover, there was no difference in the gender of the students for the factors that ignited their initial interest in STEM (p > 0.2575).
A significantly lower PCr/ATP ratio was found in the basal ganglia when compared to both the brain stem (p < 0.05) and the cerebellum (p < 0.005).
Analysis of variance tests indicated that the specific salt (or ion combination) did not have a significantly greater effect on the diameter growth of the stem (P > 0.1).
There was no statistically significant difference between isolated torsional loads and combined axial and torsional loads for either type of stem (p ≥ 0.2).
Similar(48)
Pastures not burned in over 3 years had no new layering stems (P < 0.01) (Figure 3A).
When comparing the rate of key complications as a function of component design we found a significantly higher incidence with the use of standard straight stems compared to the other different designed stems (P = 0.002).
A greater BMD decrease was found in Scientific Hip Prosthesis (Biomet, Bridgend, UK) and SPII CoCr stems (Link, Hamburg, Germany) than in Exeter (Howmedica, London, UK), Spectron (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tenn), and SPII Titanium stems (P <.05), and the stiffer SPII CoCr stems (Link) had a larger bone loss than the SPII Titanium stems (Link).
Cancellous bone densification is associated with larger stems (P =.002).
Women were over-represented in the group of HA-coated stems (p < 0.001 for chi-square overall) (Table 3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com