Sentence examples for steadfastly ignore from inspiring English sources
The phrase "steadfastly ignore" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a strong and unwavering decision to disregard something or someone. Example: "Despite the overwhelming evidence presented, the committee chose to steadfastly ignore the concerns raised by the community."
I didn't watch The Wire till around halfway through series two, delayed by the fact that I'm one of those people who steadfastly ignore things that everyone tells them will appeal to them ('snobs', I think, is the technical name).
Every day, more cars venture onto Baghdad's dust-choked streets, adding to epic traffic jams and sending blood-pressure levels through the roof, as drivers spew invective, gesticulate wildly and steadfastly ignore any and all driving laws.
"Donor agencies were given highly credible first-hand accounts of serious human rights violations during their field investigation, and they have chosen to steadfastly ignore these accounts," says the report, written by Will Hurd, an NGO worker who served as a translator for a team of DfID and USAid officials on a visit to the region in January 2012.
As a politician, she focused Dutch minds on a subject they steadfastly ignored.
Since then we've steadfastly ignored each other, and I've managed to avoid that window entirely.
And what about the wave of anti-Roma measures in other E.U. states that the commission has steadfastly ignored until now?
Instead, Bhutan has steadfastly ignored our demands; multiple rounds of talks between Bhutan and Nepal over the status of the Lhotshampa have yielded little progress.
But in the meantime, I was convinced that if I steadfastly ignored it, the pain would eventually go its own way.
While negotiations for the executive dining room were afoot, the university bosses steadfastly ignored expressions of student alarm, along with a number of requests to meet with them.
By contrast, Congress has steadfastly ignored Mr Obama's proposal in his first budget (repeated ever since) to limit the tax break for mortgage interest and charitable deductions for rich households.
Dismissing the arguments of both Mrs Albright and the World Court, the justices agreed with the Justice Department (which has steadfastly ignored Mrs Albright's concerns) that Mr Breard had no claim to a new trial.
