Sentence examples for statutes restricting from inspiring English sources

All systems of law have statutes restricting the time within which legal proceedings may be brought.

The fear of the monarchy that the skill of archers in battle would suffer led to Parliament passing statutes restricting or forbidding the playing of bowls.

Indeed, "The Wealth of Nations" calls for legal reforms, such as the repeal of statutes restricting workers' movement into trades and between localities (and keeping some wages above their so-called natural levels).

Orange has been grappling with this issue for the last month, and the Planning and Zoning Board plans to vote Wednesday, one day after the election, on new statutes restricting signs.

Officials who take an action based on the office's assurances that it would be lawful are essentially safe from prosecution, giving the agency an extraordinary power that came under sharp scrutiny during the Bush administration after it issued secret memorandums asserting that the president, as commander in chief, could override statutes restricting domestic surveillance and torture.

two imposing and competing dominions of society" but were "interdependent". Indeed, "The Wealth of Nations" calls for legal reforms, such as the repeal of statutes restricting workers' movement into trades and between localities (and keeping some wages above their so-called natural levels).

Where Federal statutes restrict the reimbursement of certain indirect costs, it may be necessary to develop a special rate for the affected Federal award.

On Thursday, his opponent, Gov. Jon S. Corzine, went so far as to accuse Mr. Christie of breaking a federal statute restricting prosecutors from even testing the waters for a campaign.

In an interview about his views on the limits of executive power with The Boston Globe six months ago, Mr. McCain strongly suggested that if he became the next commander in chief, he would consider himself obligated to obey a statute restricting what he did in national security matters.

In this Foreword, I explain why an individual conception of We the People, leads to a "republican" conception of popular sovereignty that requires a neutral magistrate to adjudicate whether a statute restricting the liberties of the We the People is within the just powers of a legislature to enact.

This requirement of a specific intent springs from the statutory use of the word 'willfully.' That word, when viewed in the context of a highly penal statute restricting freedom of expression, must be taken to mean deliberately and with a specific purpose to do the acts proscribed by Congress.