Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
The independent variables were age of respondent, sex, marital status, proportion of people aged above 50 in the household, education level and asset quintiles.
At baseline, the ICHM and CM patients were comparable with respect to gender, number of diagnoses, functional status, proportion having acute admissions and proportion receiving primary health care (Table 1).
Prevalences of hypertension, proportion of hypertensive patients aware of their hypertension status, proportion of those who were aware and under treatment, and proportion of those who were under treatment and had controlled blood pressure are presented.
We first present descriptive and bivariate results by country and year of survey on women's HIV status, proportion of women ever tested and tested in the survey, proportion of women who wanted more children, and those currently using contraceptive by HIV status.
Using standard ANOVA calculations in fact [ 31], the analysis of a prior household survey conducted in the area in 2002 revealed that the intra-cluster correlation coefficient for relevant variables (household socioeconomic status, proportion of household members reporting at least fair health, household spending on medical care) had a median of 0.04 (see Additional File 1).
Contrariwise, when adjusted on socio-economic variables, such as unemployment levels (proportion of unemployed people) or immigrant status (proportion of foreigners in the total population), the most likely cluster remained the same size, with a relatively larger decrease in the likelihood ratio (the value decreases from 7.14 to 6.36 and 5.52 respectively) (Table 3).
Similar(50)
Figure 3 Variations in Labour Market Status (proportions).
These (distributions of age, gender, educational levels and socioeconomic status, proportions living in rural and urban areas, etc).
Further evidence of 'proof of concept' is shown by looking at the weight status proportions.
To describe the sample according to their frailty status, proportions, means, and respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) are presented.
We assumed that smoking status proportions were the same across all age groups, so the expected incidence rate according to sex and smoking status was modified using the following formulae: The expected incidence rates for ex-smokers and current smokers were assumed to be 2.2 times and 4.5 times of that of nonsmokers, respectively, among men, and 3.7 times and 4.2 times, respectively, among women.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com