Exact(6)
The descriptive statistics, comparisons, and logistic regression models were produced using SAS statistical software (version 9.3; SAS Institute Inc ,Cary, NC), and significance was set at α =.05.
Descriptive statistics, comparisons and effect sizes of the SIQ BR total score between levels of independent variables are given in Table 2.
The interleukins levels were transformed to logarithmic variables for statistics comparisons in order to achieve a normal distribution.
Pairwise Φ statistics comparisons (F statistics equivalents [ 62]) were used to describe the proportion of the total genetic variance at each locus due to differences among populations.
The profile of the S statistics' comparisons was rather different from that obtained with the RS procedure, indicating that the two methods are not equivalent and that they consider matrices' properties in different ways.
In addition to descriptive statistics, comparisons have been performed with exact chi-square tests, chi-square tests for trends (linear-by-linear) when appropriate, and student t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables with and without normal distribution respectively.
Similar(54)
The data were then transferred to SPSS and analyzed by means of descriptive statistics, statistical comparisons, correlation analyses and multivariate analyses.
Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, comparison of means, and ordinal logistic regression.
not determined (already euthanized), n number of mice Statistics: comparison of treated animals to control; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 Detection limits: blood urea nitrogen: 50 mM; creatinine: 18 μM.
Table 2 (accuracy) and Table 3 (reaction time) present the summary statistics and statistical comparisons for each experiment.
For example, Figure 5 shows that the S-statistics comparisons between the Rb and Su samples from location 3 resulted in markedly lower differentiation than all the remaining between morph comparisons.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com