statistically significant results

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "statistically significant results" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it when discussing findings in research or data analysis that indicate a meaningful difference or effect that is unlikely to be due to chance. For example, "The study yielded statistically significant results, confirming the hypothesis." Alternative expressions include "meaningful results" and "notable findings."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The highest status symbol in their circle is a Rand study showing that their program yields statistically significant results.

The New York Times

On the other hand, the effects in the study are minuscule, among the smallest statistically significant results ever published.

The Guardian

Table 11 summarizes the statistically significant results.

EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing

More statistically significant results are not yet available.

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology

The sample is not sufficient to derive statistically significant results.

EPJ Data Science

It is found to be 91.7 % indicating statistically significant results.

Journal of Cloud Computing

There are no statistically significant results in age.

Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Slack says it didn't break this out on its own due to the lack of statistically significant results.

TechCrunch

The study was so compelling that it was stopped two years early because of the statistically significant results.

Huffington Post

The method requires only the assumption that, in publishing, researchers will not suppress their "statistically significant" results.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Non-statistically significant results were not displayed.

BMC Veterinary Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting research, clearly define the alpha level (p-value threshold) used to determine "statistically significant results".

Common error

Avoid assuming that "statistically significant results" automatically imply practical importance or real-world relevance. Consider effect size and context alongside p-values.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "statistically significant results" functions as an adjectival modifier followed by a noun. According to Ludwig, it indicates that the results of a study or analysis are unlikely to have occurred due to random chance.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

81%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "statistically significant results" is a common and grammatically sound expression used to describe research findings that are unlikely to be the result of chance. Predominantly found in scientific and news contexts, as reported by Ludwig, it signifies the reliability and importance of outcomes based on established statistical benchmarks. When reporting research, defining the alpha level used is crucial, but avoid automatically equating statistical significance with practical importance. Instead, consider effect size and real-world relevance. Alternatives such as "significant statistical findings" or "noteworthy statistical outcomes" offer variety without sacrificing precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significant statistical findings

Reorders the words and replaces "results" with "findings" while maintaining the core meaning.

noteworthy statistical outcomes

Substitutes "significant" with "noteworthy" and "results" with "outcomes", emphasizing the importance of the findings.

statistically validated results

Focuses on the validation aspect, indicating the results have been confirmed through statistical methods.

meaningful statistical data

Replaces "results" with "data", implying that the data has practical or theoretical value.

validated statistical conclusions

Emphasizes the verification and confirmation of the results as statistically sound conclusions.

reliable statistical evidence

Focuses on the trustworthiness and dependability of the statistical findings as evidence.

robust statistical effects

Highlights the strength and consistency of the statistical effects observed.

substantive statistical differences

Emphasizes the real and considerable nature of the differences identified statistically.

conclusive statistical data

Indicates that the statistical data definitively supports a particular conclusion.

evident statistical outcomes

Replaces "significant" with "evident", highlighting the clear and apparent nature of the statistical outcomes.

FAQs

How do I properly use "statistically significant results" in a research paper?

When reporting "statistically significant results", include the statistical test used, the p-value, and the effect size. Provide context to help readers understand the practical implications of the findings.

What does it mean when results are described as "statistically significant"?

It means the observed effect or difference is unlikely to have occurred by chance, based on a predetermined level of probability (alpha level). However, it does not guarantee practical significance.

What are some alternatives to saying "statistically significant results"?

You can use alternatives like "significant statistical findings", "noteworthy statistical outcomes", or "meaningful statistical data" depending on the context.

How does statistical significance differ from practical significance?

Statistical significance indicates whether an effect is likely due to chance, while practical significance refers to the real-world relevance or importance of the effect. A result can be statistically significant but not practically significant, and vice versa.