Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
Effects shown in bold are statistically significant (ratio of estimate: standard error > 1.96).
We thus obtained the normalized ratios and plotted proteins with statistically significant ratio values, to observe fold changes.
However, the difference in GMT between these two age groups was not statistically significant (ratio of their GMT was 1.19; 95% CI: 0.84--1.70).
Women having detectable milk concentrations of mEHP exhibited a slightly elevated, although not statistically significant, ratio between mEHP/ mEOHP + mEHHP) concentrations in urine.
Blastocystis spp. was detected at a statistically significant ratio in the inflammatory bowel disease (odds ratio [OR] = 2.824; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.149-6.944; p = 0.019) and ulcerative colitis (OR = 2.952; 95% CI: 1.183-7.367; p = 0.016) patients within this group compared to controls.
Similar(55)
Second, only iTRAQ ratios that fulfilled the 1.3 fold criteria AND are statistically significant ratios are highlighted in red (for up-regulation) and green (for down-regulation).
This lower proportion was only just statistically significant (rate ratio (RR) = 0.95; 95%CI = 0.92 – 0.92).
In the survival analysis using Cox regression model, topical ganciclovir was associated with a lower risk of recurrence but this was not statistically significant (hazard ratio = 0.857, 95 % CI 0.543 1.36, p = 0.511).
In the survival analysis using the Cox regression model, the use of topical ganciclovir was associated with a lower risk of recurrence, but this was not statistically significant (hazard ratio = 0.857, 95%% CI 0.543 1.36, p = 0.511).
However this reduction was not statistically significant (odds ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 1.03).
The incidence of malaria was slightly higher in children who received FFM ME-TRAP, but this was not statistically significant (hazard ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.3 1.0-2.3
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com