Sentence examples for statistically significant propensity from inspiring English sources

An increased (not statistically significant) propensity of T cells to differentiate into Th2 cells was observed in triple-mutants.

Because none of the covariate differences between "exposure group" and "control group" are statistically significant, propensity score matching is an appropriate method to adopt and we do not have to adjust for the covariate effect in the second step of comparing testing rates.

Nevertheless, the incidence of renal complications was significantly higher in the PCC group in the unadjusted comparison and remained higher, although not statistically significant, in the propensity score matched analysis.

This association remained statistically significant when adjusted for propensity score (age, gender and education) and controlling for smoking, scores and regularity of dental visits.

Logistic regression analysis showed that the association between moderate/severe periodontitis and psoriasis remained statistically significant when adjusted for propensity score, but was attenuated when smoking was entered into the model.

The association between psoriasis and one or more sites with bone loss ≥3 mm remained statistically significant when adjusted for propensity score and smoking and regularity of dental visits.

As shown in Table  3, the association between moderate/severe periodontitis and psoriasis remained statistically significant when adjusted for propensity score, but was attenuated when smoking was entered into the model.

The association between psoriasis and one or more sites with radiographic bone loss ≥3 mm remained statistically significant when adjusted for propensity score and smoking and regularity of dental visits (Table  4).

The continuous score was stratified into 6 balanced subgroups within which there were no statistically significant differences in the propensity between those with high recall (treatment group) and those with no/low recall (matched control group).

Longitudinal analyses indicated no statistically significant differences between sexual risk propensity scores or in incident infections of gonorrhea, chlamydia, and trichomoniasis between circumcised and uncircumcised men.

No statistically significant differences in the metastatic propensities among histological tumor types were observed (Mann–Whitney U test).